FBT 2026 Year End Guide

FBT Updates & Problem Areas

FBT Exemption for Electric Cars

Employers that provide employees with the use of eligible electric vehicles (EVs) can potentially qualify for an FBT exemption. This should normally be the case where:

• The employer owns or leases the car and allows a current employee to use the car
• The car is a zero or low emission vehicle (battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell or plug-in hybrid electric)
• The car is both first held and used on or after 1 July 2022; and
• The value of the car is below the luxury car tax threshold for fuel efficient vehicles (which is $91,387 for 2025-26 financial year.)

Overlooking or misreporting FBT on Private Use of Work Vehicles

What the ATO is looking For:

• Failure to lodge FBT returns despite providing vehicles for private use
• Misunderstanding exemptions (e.g., dual-cab utes are NOT automatically exempt)
• Neglecting record-keeping (invalid logbooks or missing odometer readings)
• Incorrectly apportioning usage (treating private travel as business use)

Employer obligations:

• Correctly identify the vehicle type (which impacts on whether they are providing a car benefit or a residual benefit)
• Maintain robust documentation
• Remember: a vehicle garaged at an employee's home is considered "available for private use"
• Invalid logbooks can lead to the "statutory formula method" being applied

Does FBT apply to your contractors?

The FBT rules tend to apply when benefits are provided to employees and certain office holders, such as directors. FBT should not apply when benefits are provided to genuine independent contractors, but determining whether a worker is an employee or contractor can be a complex process in some cases.

The ATO's ruling TR 2023/4 helps determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor.

If the parties have entered into a written contract, then you need to focus on the terms of that contract to establish the nature of the relationship (rather than looking at the conduct of the parties). However, merely labelling a worker as an independent contractor doesn't necessarily mean that they won't be treated as an employee if the terms of the contract suggest that the parties have entered into an employment relationship.

The ATO has also issued PCG 2023/2 that sets out four risk categories. Arrangements will tend to be viewed in a more favourable light where:

Reducing the FBT record keeping burden

Record keeping for FBT purposes can be onerous. However, due to some recent developments your business will have a choice to keep the existing FBT record keeping methods, use existing business records where those records meet the requirements set out by a relevant legislative instrument, or a combination of both methods.

The top FBT risk areas

Mismatched claims for entertainment – claimed as a deduction but no FBT

One of the easiest ways for the ATO to pick up on problem areas is where there are mismatches.

When it comes to entertainment, employers are often keen to claim a deduction but this can be a problem if it is not recognised as a fringe benefit provided to employees. Expenses relating to entertainment such as a meal in a restaurant are generally not deductible and no GST credits can be claimed unless the expenses are subject to FBT.

Let’s say you taken a client out to lunch and the amount per head is less than $300. If your business uses the ‘actual’ method for FBT purposes, then there often won’t be any FBT implications. This is because benefits provided to clients are not subject to FBT and minor benefits (i.e., value of less than $300) provided to employees on an infrequent and irregular basis are generally exempt from FBT. However, no deductions should be claimed for the entertainment and no GST credits would normally be available either.

If the business uses the 50/50 method, then 50% of the meal entertainment expenses would be subject to FBT (the minor benefits exemption would not apply). As a result, 50% of the expenses would be deductible and the business would be able to claim 50% of the GST credits.

Employee contributions by journal entry in the accounts

Many businesses use after-tax employee contributions to reduce the value of fringe benefits. It is also reasonably common for these contributions to be made by journal entry through the accounting system only (rather than being paid in cash).

While this can be acceptable if managed correctly, the ATO has flagged numerous concerns including whether journal entries made after the end of the FBT year are valid employee contributions.

For an employee contribution made by way of journal entry to be effective in reducing the taxable value of a benefit, all of the following conditions must be met:

• The employee must have an obligation to make a contribution to the employer towards a fringe benefit (i.e., under the employee’s remuneration agreement);
• The employer has an obligation to make a payment to the employee. For example, the parties may agree that the employer will lend an amount to the employee or the employee might be entitled to a bonus that hasn’t been paid yet. If a loan is made by the employer then this could trigger further tax issues that need to be managed;
• The employee and employer agree to set-off the employee’s obligation to the employer against the employer’s obligation to the employee; and
• The journal entries are made no later than the time the financial accounts are prepared for the current year (i.e., for income tax purposes).

Failing to ensure that arrangements involving fringe benefits and employee contributions are clearly documented can lead to problems. For example, the ATO may ask to see evidence of the fact that the employer is actually under an obligation to make contributions towards a fringe benefit. If there is no evidence, then significant FBT liabilities could arise.

Also remember that if the arrangement involves the business providing a loan to an employee this can trigger a separate loan fringe benefit issue that needs to be managed.

Not lodging FBT returns

The ATO is concerned that some employers are not lodging FBT returns when required to.

If your business employs staff (even closely held staff such as family members), and is not registered for FBT, it’s essential to ensure that the position is reviewed to check whether the business could potentially have an FBT liability.

If the business provides cars, car spaces, reimburses private (not business) expenses, provides entertainment (food and drink), employee discounts etc., then you are likely to be providing at least some fringe benefits.

There is a list of benefits that are considered exempt from FBT, such as portable electronic devices like laptops, protective clothing, tools of trade etc. If your business only provides these exempt items, or items that are infrequent and valued under $300, then you are unlikely to have to worry about FBT.